Forex broker trade against you
When you trade on a market maker's rate they are forex broker trade against you the risk into their own book. The purpose being to facilitate client's business and offer the best possible spreads - see our blog on why dealing direct with the market maker is the best option for trading FX - but some of our broker competitors have propagated the idea that market makers 'trade against you'.
The suggestion is obviously that you should trade with them. The difficulty there is that, if they are acting exclusively as a broker and taking no risk, they need to pass the risk directly on to someone who will i. So the risk generally ends up with a market maker anyway AND with an additional layer of cost. But the idea is out there, so let's have a close look at it. First lets look at why market makers take risk on to their books. A market maker publishes a continuous two way rate, allowing clients to trade at the time of their choosing.
Assume a market maker has a number of clients. Client one sells to the market maker, thinking the market goes down. The market maker could at this point turn around and sell to the market, as a broker would.
But then he cannot profitably show the market rate - buying from his client at the market rate and then selling at the same rate doesn't create a sustainable business, one that can continue to add value to its forex broker trade against you.
If the market maker takes client one's forex broker trade against you into his book, there is now a window in which another client may show up and buy on the other side of the spread. That is why market makers take risk into their books - it is to open a window in which buyers and sellers can match off across time, allowing the market maker to capture spread as compensation for providing their service, and show a better rate than brokers.
It isn't to trade 'against' their clients. Let's look a little more closely at the period between clients one and two trading. If there is anything that gives the 'trading against' nostrum its superficial appeal, it is this period where the market maker is long and the client is short. Surely forex broker trade against you is zero sum? If the market goes up the market maker wins and the client loses, and vice versa. Surely the market maker is trading against client one?
The market maker temporarily has an opposing forex broker trade against you from facilitating client ones ability to trade on the best rate. But he is not married to it. He would like to see another client show up or a passive hedging order fill as soon as possible after client one trades to neutralise his risk.
And so we come to the issue of horizon. Differing horizons - or holding periods - is what makes the relationship between market makers and their clients work, and gives the lie to the idea of trading against clients.
Different parties can win to a trade, so long as they have forex broker trade against you holding periods. So the client is short and the market maker long at The market maker is then paid three minutes later at 21 on a passive order. Client one buys back his short, forex broker trade against you two pips. The market maker earned his spread and the client was right about the market's direction and locked in his profit.
So the market maker and client can in fact have a symbiotic relationship, and the market maker can facilitate the clients ability to express his trading ideas without the layers of costs of any of the alternatives. Don't have an account? MahiFX does not provide investment advice or recommendations, and no material on this site should be construed as such. Opinions are those of the authors and not necessarily those of MahiFX, its officers or directors.
Leveraged trading is high risk and not suitable for all. You could lose some or all of your deposited funds.